Editing Advocates

From TobaccoControl Tactics
Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
<metakey>tobacco,control,industry,tobacco control,tobacco control industry,junk-science,science,ETS,second hand smoke,advocates,interests,competing,tobacco tactics</metakey>
+
 
<metadesc>A worldwide overview of Tobacco Control Advocates (Past and Present): Individuals (including scientists).</metadesc>
 
 
== Tobacco Control Advocates (Past and Present)==
 
== Tobacco Control Advocates (Past and Present)==
 
[* ''Denotes documented RWJF funding'']
 
[* ''Denotes documented RWJF funding'']
Line 15: Line 14:
 
*'''Banzhaf, John'''
 
*'''Banzhaf, John'''
 
:Founder of Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), Banzhaf has never met a smoking restriction he did not like, having spoken in support, for example, of bans in apartment and condominium complexes, and job discrimination against smokers. All the way back in 2006 he made it clear that his ultimate intention was total control of smokers, even in their homes: [http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2006/02/26/states-time-to-stub-out-smoking.html "Here we are literally reaching into the last frontier  — right into the home... No longer can you argue, ‘My home is my castle. I've got the right to smoke.’"]  Also see some  [http://www.velvetgloveironfist.com/john_banzhaf_smoking.php background on Banzhaf] by author Christopher Snowdon.
 
:Founder of Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), Banzhaf has never met a smoking restriction he did not like, having spoken in support, for example, of bans in apartment and condominium complexes, and job discrimination against smokers. All the way back in 2006 he made it clear that his ultimate intention was total control of smokers, even in their homes: [http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2006/02/26/states-time-to-stub-out-smoking.html "Here we are literally reaching into the last frontier  — right into the home... No longer can you argue, ‘My home is my castle. I've got the right to smoke.’"]  Also see some  [http://www.velvetgloveironfist.com/john_banzhaf_smoking.php background on Banzhaf] by author Christopher Snowdon.
 
 
*'''Bauld, Linda'''
 
*'''Bauld, Linda'''
 
:A "smoking cessation expert" at the University of Bath until 2010, and now Professor of Socio-Management at the University of Stirling, United Kingdom, Dr. Bauld has displayed typical TC obliviousness in stating her incredulity that smokers should be appalled and enraged at government-supported programs designed to destroy smokers' finances, careers, families, social dignity, and their lives generally.
 
:A "smoking cessation expert" at the University of Bath until 2010, and now Professor of Socio-Management at the University of Stirling, United Kingdom, Dr. Bauld has displayed typical TC obliviousness in stating her incredulity that smokers should be appalled and enraged at government-supported programs designed to destroy smokers' finances, careers, families, social dignity, and their lives generally.
 
 
*'''Benowitz, Neal'''
 
*'''Benowitz, Neal'''
 
:Prof. of medicine, UC San Francisco. A reviewer for ''Tobacco Control''. A member and discussion group chair for Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). Known for his role in the redefinition of the word "addiction" so that it could specifically apply more strongly to smoking.
 
:Prof. of medicine, UC San Francisco. A reviewer for ''Tobacco Control''. A member and discussion group chair for Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). Known for his role in the redefinition of the word "addiction" so that it could specifically apply more strongly to smoking.
Line 29: Line 26:
 
:Bero has been given substantial RWJF money for this project, the results of which were published in ''JAMA'' (''Journal of the American Medical Association'') in 1999. Basically the “study” says any studies conducted with tobacco funding are bad, but those conducted with other funding (ostensibly including pharmaceutical money from RWJF) are good.  A reviewer for ''Tobacco Control''.
 
:Bero has been given substantial RWJF money for this project, the results of which were published in ''JAMA'' (''Journal of the American Medical Association'') in 1999. Basically the “study” says any studies conducted with tobacco funding are bad, but those conducted with other funding (ostensibly including pharmaceutical money from RWJF) are good.  A reviewer for ''Tobacco Control''.
 
*'''Berteletti-Kemp, Florence'''
 
*'''Berteletti-Kemp, Florence'''
:Works as a consultant on European Union health policy to the Smoke Free Partnership in Brussels and is the Vice President of the European Public Health Alliance.In 2009 she trampled on democratic principles and managed to rally support from the tobacco control community to convince the European parliament to forbid a [http://www.antiprohibition.org/ticap_pages.php?q=12 scheduled conference] organized by international free-choice groups to discuss the concerns of encroaching prohibition.  Some of them falsely accused the organizers of this conference to be tobacco industry representatives when in fact these groups and delegates were ordinary citizens wanting to exercise their right to free speech in a parliament that belongs to all people.  
+
:Works as a consultant on European Union health policy to the Smoke Free Partnership in Brussels and is the Vice President of the European Public Health Alliance.
 
*'''Biener, Lois'''*
 
*'''Biener, Lois'''*
 
:Senior Research Fellow, University of Massachusetts at Boston Center for Survey Research, Boston MA.  Listed as a media contact in RWJF’s guide for the “Survey on Responses to the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program.”  The survey would, among other things, “determine the characteristics of smokers who are most responsive to media messages and to determine which segments of the population are most likely to adopt anti-tobacco stances.” Biener received $220,152 from RWJF for that “study.” She is a frequent RWJF grantee who often publishes journal articles with other  RWJF grantees.
 
:Senior Research Fellow, University of Massachusetts at Boston Center for Survey Research, Boston MA.  Listed as a media contact in RWJF’s guide for the “Survey on Responses to the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program.”  The survey would, among other things, “determine the characteristics of smokers who are most responsive to media messages and to determine which segments of the population are most likely to adopt anti-tobacco stances.” Biener received $220,152 from RWJF for that “study.” She is a frequent RWJF grantee who often publishes journal articles with other  RWJF grantees.
Line 58: Line 55:
  
 
*'''Chapman, Simon'''
 
*'''Chapman, Simon'''
:Australian-based sociologist and [http://velvetgloveironfist.blogspot.com/2012/01/work-of-art.html anti-smoking zealot].  In 1995 he was caught urging colleagues to doctor a paper that didn't show that environmental tobacco smoke significantly increased a person's risk for lung cancer.  Excerpt from a two page fax he sent, advising against publishing the paper as is lest the Australian tobacco control movement be ridiculed by the journalists.  ''“[L]ook at Table 7 in the way any journalist would … a reasonable conclusion will be that the idea that there is ANY lung cancer caused by ETS (environmental tobacco smoke) in Australia will be seen as a huge joke.”'' Copies of the fax can be found [http://members.iinet.net.au/~ray/ETS1.jpg here] and [http://members.iinet.net.au/~ray/ETS2.jpg here].  
+
:Australian-based sociologist and [http://velvetgloveironfist.blogspot.com/2012/01/work-of-art.html anti-smoking zealot].  In 1995 he was caught urging colleagues to doctor a paper that didn't show that environmental tobacco smoke significantly increased a person's risk for lung cancer.  Excerpt from a two page fax he sent them not to publish the paper as is lest the Australian tobacco control movement be ridiculed by the journalists.  ''“..look at Table 7 in the way any journalist would … a reasonable conclusion will be that the idea that there is ANY lung cancer caused by ETS (environmental tobacco smoke) in Australia will be seen as a huge joke.”  Copies of the fax can be found [http://members.iinet.net.au/~ray/ETS1.jpg here] and [http://members.iinet.net.au/~ray/ETS2.jpg here].  
 
    
 
    
 
*'''Cherner, Joe'''*
 
*'''Cherner, Joe'''*
Line 206: Line 203:
 
*'''Pope, Gregory'''*
 
*'''Pope, Gregory'''*
 
:Center for Health Economics Research, Inc., Waltham, MA.  Listed in RWJF media guide for “Study of the Adoption and Economic Effects of Smoke-free Restaurant Ordinances in Massachusetts.”  Results were expected in early 1997.
 
:Center for Health Economics Research, Inc., Waltham, MA.  Listed in RWJF media guide for “Study of the Adoption and Economic Effects of Smoke-free Restaurant Ordinances in Massachusetts.”  Results were expected in early 1997.
*'''Proctor, Robert'''
 
:The historian Robert N Proctor, author of The Nazi War on Cancer, has regularly argued that, despite their more egregious errors, the Nazis were in fact capable of performing very good scientific work. And on several occasions he has cited the example of the V2 rocket. In 2008, he wrote an article in 'Tobacco Control' titled [http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/17/5/289.extract?etoc 'On playing the Nazi card'].
 
:Robert Proctor clearly wishes to associate Nazi antismoking research with the former kind of respectable science. But into which category does it really fall? Adolf Hitler ignored and scorned the V2 rocket for an entire decade, but he put 100,000 Reichsmarks of his own money into The Scientific Institute for the Research into the Hazards of Tobacco, an institute whose very name indicates clearly its prejudicial intent, as did the telegram from Hitler it received at its [http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/30/1/35.full inauguration]: "I send my best wishes for your work which will liberate mankind from one of its most dangerous poisons". The Nazi assault on tobacco was part and parcel of its programme to rid German society of such 'poisons', of which the Jews were one, and tobacco was another. 
 
 
*'''Rabin, Robert'''*
 
*'''Rabin, Robert'''*
 
:Professor of law at Stanford University Law School.  Served as Senior Consultant for RWJF’s “Tobacco and substance abuse policy program.”
 
:Professor of law at Stanford University Law School.  Served as Senior Consultant for RWJF’s “Tobacco and substance abuse policy program.”
Line 254: Line 248:
 
:It should be noted however that many in the Free Choice community are still quite critical of Siegel's stance in a number of areas. Some feel, and have argued strongly, that Siegel's criticisms of some anti-smoker policies may simply represent a tactical view designed to support "effective" anti-smoking policies rather than representing any real philosophical criticism of anti-smoking goals.  
 
:It should be noted however that many in the Free Choice community are still quite critical of Siegel's stance in a number of areas. Some feel, and have argued strongly, that Siegel's criticisms of some anti-smoker policies may simply represent a tactical view designed to support "effective" anti-smoking policies rather than representing any real philosophical criticism of anti-smoking goals.  
 
:Siegel is correct that a popular backlash against Tobacco Control has long been forming and is rapidly growing. His prescription for tactical adjustment of TC policies (which some have compared to Mikhail Gorbachev's 1980s policy of attempting preservation of Communism in the USSR through institution of moderate reform) is likely to fail to preserve the core of more basic Tobacco Control objectives from ultimate destruction by the excesses of the extremists.  Those he has become critical of generally seek total denormalization and  prohibition despite any human costs involved.
 
:Siegel is correct that a popular backlash against Tobacco Control has long been forming and is rapidly growing. His prescription for tactical adjustment of TC policies (which some have compared to Mikhail Gorbachev's 1980s policy of attempting preservation of Communism in the USSR through institution of moderate reform) is likely to fail to preserve the core of more basic Tobacco Control objectives from ultimate destruction by the excesses of the extremists.  Those he has become critical of generally seek total denormalization and  prohibition despite any human costs involved.
*'''Sirchia, Girolamo'''
 
:Italian Minister of Health from June 2001 to April 2005 and known for the Italian smoking ban (Sirchia law) in all indoor public places.  As reported in [http://www.italymag.co.uk/italy/crime/ex-health-minister-sirchia-convicted-graft Italy Mag ] he was convicted to three years in jail and was banned from holding public office for five years for graft. 
 
 
*'''Sitzer, Maxine'''
 
*'''Sitzer, Maxine'''
 
:Prof. Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins Univ. School of Medicine.  Committee Chair, Society of Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (Scientific Liaison: Public Policy Council).
 
:Prof. Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins Univ. School of Medicine.  Committee Chair, Society of Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (Scientific Liaison: Public Policy Council).

Please note that all contributions to TobaccoControl Tactics may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see TobaccoControl Tactics:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)